It is astonishing how some people link world-wide Islamist extremism to Israel's action regarding Gaza. The most recent example being Jo Johnson MP in the Spectator magazine.
I have no problem with Mr Johnson, setting out the desperate situation. Where I differ with him however, is not just with the reason for that misery, but also the cause of terrorism and Islamism itself.
In his concluding remarks Mr Johnson states :
"It was out of 'loyalty to [her] Muslim brothers and sisters in Palestine' that Roshonara Chaudhry (the Islamist who stabbed an MP in East London) dropped out of King's College London and set off on her murderous mission".
But, this is the worst kind of moral equivalence. It implies that the actions of one (in this case Roshonara Chaudhry), are understandable, because of the conflict in Palestine. The reality is that, even if the conflict was solved tomorrow, with Israel retreating mostly to 1967 Borders, the Roshonara Chaudry's of this world would still exist.
The objective of Islamists world-wide is not a peaceful resolution to the Middle East, but Jihad, and an ideology that believes, Israel - and by extension, Jews - should be wiped off the map per se. President Ahmadinejad for example, makes no distinction between the West Bank and Tel Aviv. Instead, the 'Zionist entity' must be destroyed per se.
When Ehud Barak offered almost everything to Yasir Arafat at Camp David in 2000, far from discouraging Islamists, it emboldened them. When Israel withdrew from Gaza - unilaterally - in 2005, far from stopping Islamism, it encouraged them - with terrorist acts around the world. Islamists exist because of ideology - not policy differences.
Secondly, Mr Johnson falls into the trap of seeing Gaza with 'Unesco'/Palestinian Solidarity spectacles. No mention was made of the Hamas Coup against the more moderate Fatah movement in 2007. No recognition of the 6,000 missiles fired by Islamists onto Israeli towns since the Gaza withdrawal. No reply to the blowing up of Border crossings by Hamas, or the hijacking of aid convoys for their own purposes. No acknowledgement of the million tons of humanitarian supplies that have entered Gaza, since 2009 alone from Israel, or the 15,000 tons of supplies entering Gaza every week.
Why does he and other critics not urge the Egyptians to open their border to Gaza, in the same way they implore the Israelis?
Of course anyone visiting Gaza, seeing the misery and repression feels angry. But that is no reason to lay most of the blame at Israel's door or even imply moral equivalence between a democratic state subject to the rule of law - and Islamists who seek nothing of the kind.
P.S. The above is also published as a letter in the Spectator this week.